Saturday, April 4, 2026

End of the Line.

Life is too short and the Blog of late has consumed a lot of my energy and time. But no more.


Thanks for riding along and hopefully we will all survive 2026.


I will leave the past posts on the blog for about two weeks and then all will be removed. 


Pat Boone, early in his career shared some advice given to him by Bing Crosby. The story goes Crosby said to Boone, Kid don't stay on too long. I have stayed on too long.

Them that know, survive.

Pete N6QW

The new face of the Ham Radio Operator

 




The Melding of Ham Radio & Social Media



A blog reader sent me this video, and I thought the proud, the few and the brave N6QW blog readers would like to see this. The "Glam Ham" is out here on the left coast and is the new face of a ham radio operator. 

She is an Extra and has some very nice higher end station equipment. This video is live streamed, and the call signs mentioned are DX calls and quite a following. I surmise she has a lot of stick time behind the mic as she mentions at one time being a commercial disc jockey. 

There did not appear to be any home-grown rigs in her shack and certainly in line with the very large majority of today's hams. But with certainty a good ambassador for our beloved hobby.

Them that know, survive. Tomorrow is Easter and I pray for the safety of our troops who are in harm's way.

73's
Pete N6QW

Friday, April 3, 2026

Consistent Performance with the new PNP CW Transmitter

Let me put in a context easily understood... You get dates with good looking YLs all the time not just one time with one good looking YL.


More data as I just took a look with the RBN at 6AM on April 3, transmitting on 7013 kHz. I was heard in the 400-to-900-mile range running 300 milliwatts. That tells me two things as the PNP CW transmitter can yield consistent contacts and the need for a solid design with appropriate harmonic filters. Low power out of ham band signals can be heard at great distances.


I have run QRP for many years but at the watt level not milliwatts. The solid acid test of course is real contacts not the RBN. But the Reverse Beacon Network is a strong indicator of performance especially if it is consistent. 

The two crystals (7030 and 7055 kHz) I have coming are frequencies considered as watering holes and lots of activity and so that should set us up for the real acid test. (I really splurged and paid $10 including shipping for the two rocks. I stole money from my grocery budget.)

I will stop posting on this subject in deference to those who do not do home grown radios. Guess this being a holiday weekend the bands will be choked with contests and POTA/SOTA crap. So maybe a good time to work on the T/R sequencer.

Them that know, survive. I had a near cardiac arrest experience yesterday when I bought 6 gallons of gas and that took two $20 bills. I have a 20-year-old car and get about 23 mpg. So that comes to 23 * 6 = 138 mile range. That means two weeks of visits to the cemetery to visit the XYL (60 miles) and a doctor visit on Monday (28 miles) and three trips for groceries, banking and miscellaneous (30 miles). That leaves me 20 miles for a buffer. Thank You, Donald Trump for starting a war!

73's
Pete N6QW

Thursday, April 2, 2026

PNP CW QRP Rig now on 40M

 





The home-grown rig has been moved to 40M on 7013 kHz and gets 12 Volts PTP out of the W3NQN LPF. That is 360 milliwatts. At 7 AM my signal was heard in the 600-to-800-mile range. 


I have ordered "rocks" for 7030 and 7055 kHz. (The original MC1496 DCR was built for 40M.) The additional power output can be traced to the crystal itself and that the circuit components in the driver stage favor 40M versus 20M. The emitter bypass cap in the driver plays a big part in the frequency spread.


Them that know, survive. Of note do you believe only a couple of more weeks in the Iran war. Reminds me of when I went to Vietnam... like 10 years. Survival depends on trusting your gut and the actions you personally take.


73's

Pete N6QW



Wednesday, April 1, 2026

PNP Transistor CW Transmitter... SUCCESS!

Productive day yesterday as I came up with a good Colpitts type Oscillator circuit and with some more biasing adjustments we are getting 9.4 Volts PTP at the output side of the W3NQN Filter.







New oscillator board, the Amp and Keyer Board plus LPF 

Thus our 9.4 Volts PTP translates to (9.4^2) * 2.5 = 221 Milliwatts which is a good start (from 50 milliwatts). All Devices are 2N2905's and PNP.

[JIC... Vrms = 0.35355 * Vptp or Vrms = 0.35355 * 9.4 or 3.32337 Vrms. Vrms^2/50 = power in WATTS. 3.32337^2/50 = 0.220895763 Watts or 221 Milliwatts. Or using my short cut Vptp^2 * 2.5 = power output in milliwatts. QED]


221 Milliwatts @ 14.060 MHz. Clean Pattern

The next step is to see if it is heard on the Reverse Beacon Network. That should prove interesting. For a pair of Ears in the final lash up, I am going to use my MC1496 Direct Conversion Receiver. The sweet smell of success!


Imagine that... my 221 milliwatts heard by DX at 2523 Miles


With 221 Milliwatts I was heard out to 2500 Miles which is about 11.3 miles per milliwatt. Good Show OM.

This home-grown stuff can be real fun stuff and for me better than 5X9, Park 12345. This little project is a throwback to when hams were hams. I engineered this rig and not something the average ham today can do! That is OK as the ham radio tent is large and those that can home grow a rig is almost infinitesimal. So, the 1% is an aberration but still a part of the hobby.  We are a beacon to those who feel guilty they can only do contests, operate or watch you tube videos of YL's calling CQ POTA.

Time to think about integrating the Transmitter and DCR into a homogenous rig. The MC1496 DCR BTW has a PNP RF amplifier stage. I thought may be an Arduino to handle the switching. Sort of something old something new.

Them that know, survive. Will you survive?



73's
Pete N6QW

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

I turned on my soldering iron!

You ask why did you turn on the iron when ham radio is not about building things. It is all about contests, operating and watching You Tube Videos of YL's making POTA contacts.


Just because is my answer as I want to explore circuits that may be obscure or not very often used. It is like a technical challenge thing for me. Maybe the challenge for most hams today is staying awake during contests and operating.


But for me right now.... I want to revisit using PNP Transistors in a CW transmitter. Yes, Sony has identified that NPN transistors are better for their products. But unlike the ARRL and their proposed CSI grading system, PNP transistors can work in RF circuits without fear of getting flat feet, jock itch, dandruff, toe fungus or an STD. The key to this project is no cost and use what is in the junk box. Brent Crude today > $113 a barrel.



Firstly, I should mention I have a box of 100 Russian Germanium PNP transistors that I bought years ago at a cost of 20 cents each. These are good in the UHF range and found it can produce 0.8 Volts PTP at 14 MHz, in a crystal oscillator circuit. That my friend that is 1.6 milliwatts. So, it will need a big boost to put out at least 100 milliwatts (about 20dBm) or 18 dB gain from 1.6 milliwatts. We are using what we have in the junk box.

My first hurdle was a Google literature search for PNP Oscillator circuits and that turned up lots of sample circuits... all NPN which of course was not useful. The same type of results with Copilot. Then I thought about my library shelf. Forget EMRFD but struck Gold with the Transistor Radio Handbook by Stoner and Earnshaw. 

I went back to Copilot and said did you consider the Stoner/Earnshaw publication. Copilot's reply was Pete you struck Gold. It then spit out a circuit using either a 2N2907 or 2N3906. Of course, I want to use the Russian Germanium Transistor, so I have a starting place.


Back of Envelope Schematic... It Bombed!

Useless...



Here is an interesting story about the Russian Germanium Transistors. I had the scope on the output of a test circuit and pulled the crystal and found out I still had a scope trace. The built-in counter read 234 MHz. [kB=1] It was either self-oscillating or a parasitic oscillation. So indeed, in the UHF range.


PNP CW Transmitter

I had previously built a PNP Driver Stage that now looks like this.



I am still working on the oscillator circuit itself as I really want about 10 milliwatts from the oscillator stage as that would get me about 300 Milliwatts out of the Driver. Now we are cooking!

Looking through the junk box, I found an NPN Oscillator board and with a bit of jury rigging have it working with the Russian PNP Transistor and an earlier version PNP Driver using a 20M QRP Crystal. The Output was only 50 milliwatts. Thus, more work at boosting the output of the oscillator. 

Ultimately, I want it to work to develop several hundred milliwatts using PNP devices. We now have the Copilot suggested Colpitts topology and so we will begin building that circuit.

Well, that Colpitts circuit did not do as well as the junk box NPN adapted to PNP. I swapped out some bias resistors and with a bit of good luck now get 8.4 Volts PTP out of the Driver at 14.06 MHz and that translates to 176 Milliwatts. If I could get 9 Volts PTP that is 200 Milliwatts [9X9X2.5 = 202.5]. There is also a change in that now there are 2N2905's in all three sockets: Oscillator, Driver and Keying Transistor. 

At the Oscillator, with some resistance changes I now get 1.24 Volts PTP with the 2N2905. That is 3.84 Milliwatts. Thus, our Driver stage is producing 16.6 dB of gain. [10*log (176/3.84) = 16.6] LT Spice calculates the Driver stage gain at > 18dB.

I also earlier found a P MOSFET equivalent to the IRF510 and so a possible pair of "boots" for the basic PNP circuit. OTs know a pair of boots is an outboard amplifier for boosting your signal.

For me this is more fun than yelling CQ POTA, 5X9, Park 12345. But for the 99% majority of hams the 5X9, Park 12345 is the soup du jour.

Them that know, survive. Stay Tuned!

73's
Pete N6QW



Monday, March 30, 2026

So, how are you doing?

The answer to that question is of course it depends. If you are in the bottom 90% of Americans, the answer maybe not so well.


I asked Copilot to assess the effect of the Big Beautiful Bill of 2025 and given the tariffs, a war with Iran, and the employment situation how does it look for lower income and middle-income Americans.

It is the end of the month, and I can tell the disposable income is just not there. Thus, the question to Copilot and the response.

Final Verdict: Are lower‑ and middle‑income Americans losing?
Yes — when you combine:
✔️ Tax cuts from the One Big Beautiful Bill (positive)
with
❌ Tariffs (negative)
❌ Inflation on essentials (negative)
❌ War‑driven energy spikes (negative)
❌ Rising unemployment (negative)
❌ Cuts to safety‑net programs (negative)
…the net effect is negative for both lower‑income and middle‑income households.

This is not a political interpretation — it is exactly what the distributional models show.

So, for the majority who voted for you know who, time to vote your wallet in the mid-terms.

Today you are faced with a tough choice of either putting 3 gallons of gas in your car or buying a $20 Pixie Transceiver.


Them that know, survive!

73's
Pete N6QW







End of the Line.

Life is too short and the Blog of late has consumed a lot of my energy and time. But no more. Thanks for riding along and hopefully we will ...