The last couple of posts dealt with HARDWARE to measure SWR. But why is a high SWR a BAD thing. Often quoted, a high SWR is on par with what happens when the gas gauge is almost empty. Or as we well know, if you had a Red Ryder BB gun you will shoot your eye out! Or the cute Red Head has only a slight STD. Basically, two impacts are: 1) max RF from your rig is not getting to the ionosphere and 2) you risk serious damage to your rig. For many hams the idea of a puny signal is a far greater impact than a smoked rig. Hey, it's just more added on the plastic. But a high SWR also can cause unwanted feedback and then your signal is not only puny, but it sounds terrible. Manufacturers will caution their radio can safely operate with a 2:1 SWR or never exceed a 3:1 SWR. Some radios will sense when your SWR is approaching a danger point and even have circuitry that will idle back the power to values that won't harm the radio. (Fold Back Current Limiting). Disclaimer -- I actually neve
Once again, the Amazon Phantom has struck! In yesterday's mail was a package from Amazon containing a pumice scraping stone to clean the toilet bowl. To my benefactor I thank you, and I truly appreciate your generosity. Anyone else feeling the urge to send a pumice stone -- I am good. A gallon of 12% Hydrogen Peroxide ... OOOPS Here I am soliciting and that is not my intent. Please do not send any H202. Now a giant plug for the G-QRP Club and the SPRAT publication. I am lucky to own a SPRAT on a STICK, which essentially is a compendium of all of the SPRAT articles going back to #1 and carried forward to the most recent all on a USB Stick. Be aware that the compendium is only as recent to when the stick was burned. But I did find Issue #61 on my stick which covers the Stockton Bridge in an article entitled A Bi-Directional Inline Wattmeter pp 12-16. (David Stockton, G4ZNQ). No "Digital Stuff" here just two meters. G4ZNQ's description of the circuit and its function i