Skip to main content

May 11, 2024. Basically, I am really pissed off!

Being Italian, it does not take too much to get up my ire!  Yesterday on my phone showed up a link to a hackaday posting. It was a wonderful sharing about a spy type transceiver built into a matchbox. Not an Altoids tin but a real live match box! Then, I got pissed off!



Above is a photo of the project and the battery pack. The rig, a CW transceiver, is on 80M and even included a clandestine NVIS antenna. [NVIS, read a droopy dipole you can't get off the ground.]

I thought the project was superb and a real challenge and accomplishment! My irritation was how it was received by the hackaday lurkers! The designer is a well-known homebrewer and has built many spy type radios but this I believe is a first in a matchbox for him.

Comments came like "well another boring CW transceiver". Or "it is only a 1 transistor transmitter". How about "why didn't he use AM"?

Given some of the wording it appears these comments came from outside the US and besides not many US hams can or do homebrew rigs that fit in a match box.

I have a personal connection with this project as I can speak from experience that building a rig in a small form factor is more than 2 hours work. I do know what he had to do to come up with a working rig that fits in a really confined space.  I thought my 16 cubic inch SSB transceiver was small but not even close!

My P3ST rig when it appeared in hackaday got a similar reception like -- "there are no circuit boards". "N6QW didn't post the code on a GitHub." Or there are transistors in the LM386 and the Arduino and Si5351 --so he is lying when he says it is a 7 transistor SSB transceiver. 

[My view of GitHub is on par with my view of Nano VNA's. I am happy to share code and having an email request lets me track the response and from where there is interest in the project.]

Instead of celebrating that a homebrewer took on a challenge and was successful, we get the crap comments. With 100% certainty those who made the comments never built nor ever will build a project like this. I sense the real reason for the negative comments is a deep sense of envy that these wannabe commenters are incapable of pulling off such a project.

Recently I have taken to dusting off some of the rigs I have built and made a few contacts. I have been surprised at the number of contacts being made at QRP power levels. [Must be the sunspots.] 

Just yesterday with this radio (SMD version of the LBS) during the radio blackout I got a 5X5 from a POTA station in northern Utah. I checked the Pout, and it was slightly better than 1 watt!

Note the dust --it has been a long time since it was used.


Above is an SMD version of the Plessey amp and the cores are FT-23-43. The filter is an INRAD 4 pole filter kit. Note the grounding of the Crystal Cans. The matching caps (SSB) are SMD supplied with the kit.


The above photo shows the Mic Amp (left) and Audio Amp (right) where most of the stage is SMD. There was a great deal of time spent on circuit layout so that SMD parts could be used.

Oh, now the comments -- there is a circuit board but not on GitHub!

We must call out the lurkers for what they are and that is they are not true hams nor have the ham spirit. Our matchbox rig made a successful QSO on 80M at over 200KM. All of us should celebrate this accomplishment and recognize the few hams who have the knack and homebrew skills. 

73's
Pete N6QW


Popular posts from this blog

January 26, 2024. A simple CW Transceiver/Transmitter

Cruise through the lower part of the ham bands bands and what do you hear? Well, FT-8 and CW. Often you will not hear any SSB stations yet go to the lower part of the bands, and it is a cacophony (I love that word) of bad sounding signals and some high-speed keying. Fast is not so much of the issue as is bad, run together and jerky keying. But none the less our hobby started there.    So, you could crank down your ICOM 7300 and watch the waterfall on CW or you could homebrew a radio. Actually, to do CW right you need more thought up front than you do with a SSB transceiver. Often, I will state that a CW Transceiver is much more difficult to build than a simple SSB rig. I published two articles in QRP Quarterly on CW transceivers and all I got was a yawn so maybe history will repeat itself.  Yawn!   30M CW Transceiver with RIT!   Of interest is that the LO is a Varactor tuned LC oscillator using a NE602. Look closely at the RIT circuit which is only activated on ...
Read more

August 30, 2024. A PNP 20M SSB Transceiver

Shown below is the Block Diagram for the 20M PNP SSB Transceiver steered in the  Transmit Mode . The components shown in the dotted block are relay steered so that the block module is single pass and amplifies in a single direction. The Block diagram show steered in Transmit.  Essentially the steering process works so that the IF Module input follows the Balanced Modulator on Transmit and then the input side follows the Receive Mixer on Receive. All done with some relays and a bit of RG174U coax. For those who count things in detail, this block diagram is not unlike what was used for the PSSST Transceiver which can be found on my website . Yes, a warmed over P3ST only using PNP devices. TYGNYBNT. 73's Pete N6QW
Read more

March 31, 2024. Happy Easter to those who celebrate this day.

What a great day to Binge on Chocolate and experience the pain of that filling that has been leaking.  I would be in that category with the leaking filling(s) had I not just spent an amount equivalent to one of the fancy new uptown appliance box transceivers on two filling repairs. Well at least I can binge on the Chocolate bunnies without fear of pain. Regrettably everything appears to have jumped in price including the price of parts. Well not so much the parts as the shipping costs.  That notably is seen in the eBay treasures. I spotted a nice heathkit DX-20 for about $50 and the shipping was $65. Likely it is a twofer with part being a way to in effect charge a higher price by inflating the shipping and in part by increased shipping costs. Shipping with insurance across the US was about $150 for this jewel and that was three years ago. 6AM on the Left Coast ~ 20M Easter Sunday! My only hope is the cost of Chocolate Bunnies remains steady although a pound of See's Candies f...
Read more