Skip to main content

April 30, 2024. Relive the days of yesteryear.

The banter on the air these days often drifts (not LC VFO's drifting) to the rig they are running. Most often it is a Yaesu or Icom and at the higher end is the FLEX or Apache Labs. Notable very few if any homebrew rigs.

Have you ever wondered about the SSB rigs being used in 1961? Those who owned a gold mine or were single might have a Collins KWM-2*, but many had Drake, Hallicrafters, National and the ever budget conscious Swan Rigs. 




Herb Johnson who started Swan Engineering later Swan Radio was a visionary and started off by producing monoband units for 75, 40 and 20 Meters. The aim was Mobile operation as this was Cycle 19. I saw my first ever Swan SW-120 in February 1963 when I was a senior at Penn State. One of the professors had the SW-120 mounted in a Sunbeam Alpine.

Later that same year when I headed out to Midway Island, I had a National NCX-3 -- should have bought the Swan 240!

About 15 years ago I bought a SW-120 and two years ago the SW-175 and two weeks ago a SW-140. Two were made in Benson, Arizona and the SW-175 was made in Oceanside. Thusly I have some of the earliest Swan radios.

The video below covers the recent purchase of the Swan SW-140 and what it took to fix it. The allure of these old radios is that you can actually fix them as they are not too complex and most parts are readily available.
 



If you are looking for a Digital Display, the AVC circuit or S Meter or Noise Blanker -- you won't find them. The radios were geared for mobile operation in what was then the US Phone Bands and are essentially a bare bone 100-watt SSB radio. The VFO drifted a bit and the 4 pole filter a bit wide. A user mod could add CW, but I thought it would not be very practical.

For the nut and bolt readers, the 100 series radios had 13 tubes and used a "grid block" method to steer tubes in the circuit path when used only for receive or only for transmit. A Relay essentially cut off various tubes by supplying a high value of negative grid voltage to the tubes being cut off. One set of contacts on that single relay disconnected the screen supply to the Final tube, a 6DQ5, during receive. 

The transmit Pi Network was always connected to the antenna and the receiving circuits were connected to that Pi Network on the input side via a 3pF High Voltage ceramic cap. Thusly, if you peaked the Pi Network on receive it was darn close to the values needed for the max power output. The Receiver RF Amp tube was biased to cut off on transmit.

The tube line up drifted like a loose lady of the night (or poorly built LC VFO). The early radios used the 6BA6 in several sockets. Later tubes like the 6CB6 were used in the IF line up in place of the 6BA6. Some filament changes were made to accommodate the tube changes, In one radio you might have a 6BA6 and a later unit a 12BA6 in the same socket.

In the early builds the tune up was done by shifting the carrier oscillator and tripping the PTT all done with a DPST switch. That must have been unreliable as later a 12AV6 tube was added to create a Tone Oscillator for tune up. Since there was little room on the top of the chassis for this additional tube, the 12AV6 was mounted horizontally on a sub-chassis fitted underneath the chassis. The SWAN SW-140 being an early model (S/N 398-5) does not have the 12AV6. 

Enjoy the video and see how I solved the rig problem to get it back on the air.

73's
Pete N6QW  

* A friend once shared after graduating from college and a bachelor he had the following in his apartment: a chaise lounge for sleeping, a fork and a knife and a Collins KWM-2. He laments that life was good then!

Popular posts from this blog

January 26, 2024. A simple CW Transceiver/Transmitter

Cruise through the lower part of the ham bands bands and what do you hear? Well, FT-8 and CW. Often you will not hear any SSB stations yet go to the lower part of the bands, and it is a cacophony (I love that word) of bad sounding signals and some high-speed keying. Fast is not so much of the issue as is bad, run together and jerky keying. But none the less our hobby started there.    So, you could crank down your ICOM 7300 and watch the waterfall on CW or you could homebrew a radio. Actually, to do CW right you need more thought up front than you do with a SSB transceiver. Often, I will state that a CW Transceiver is much more difficult to build than a simple SSB rig. I published two articles in QRP Quarterly on CW transceivers and all I got was a yawn so maybe history will repeat itself.  Yawn!   30M CW Transceiver with RIT!   Of interest is that the LO is a Varactor tuned LC oscillator using a NE602. Look closely at the RIT circuit which is only activated on ...

August 30, 2024. A PNP 20M SSB Transceiver

Shown below is the Block Diagram for the 20M PNP SSB Transceiver steered in the  Transmit Mode . The components shown in the dotted block are relay steered so that the block module is single pass and amplifies in a single direction. The Block diagram show steered in Transmit.  Essentially the steering process works so that the IF Module input follows the Balanced Modulator on Transmit and then the input side follows the Receive Mixer on Receive. All done with some relays and a bit of RG174U coax. For those who count things in detail, this block diagram is not unlike what was used for the PSSST Transceiver which can be found on my website . Yes, a warmed over P3ST only using PNP devices. TYGNYBNT. 73's Pete N6QW

March 31, 2024. Happy Easter to those who celebrate this day.

What a great day to Binge on Chocolate and experience the pain of that filling that has been leaking.  I would be in that category with the leaking filling(s) had I not just spent an amount equivalent to one of the fancy new uptown appliance box transceivers on two filling repairs. Well at least I can binge on the Chocolate bunnies without fear of pain. Regrettably everything appears to have jumped in price including the price of parts. Well not so much the parts as the shipping costs.  That notably is seen in the eBay treasures. I spotted a nice heathkit DX-20 for about $50 and the shipping was $65. Likely it is a twofer with part being a way to in effect charge a higher price by inflating the shipping and in part by increased shipping costs. Shipping with insurance across the US was about $150 for this jewel and that was three years ago. 6AM on the Left Coast ~ 20M Easter Sunday! My only hope is the cost of Chocolate Bunnies remains steady although a pound of See's Candies f...