Skip to main content

June 23, 2024. When radio was radio and not an IC7300.

According to an unreliable source (The Internet) Marconi is fingered as the 1st ham. But in fact, it was Heinrich Hertz who is credited with the theory that there could be radio waves back in 1890. It also said the 1st ham club was not at MIT or Stanford but Columbia University in 1908.


But with certainty the period 1930's to 1960 produced some really cool looking radios (with some exceptions like the S-38E or the SW-54). The designs had curb appeal and for some strange reason could capture your heart just like a blonde hottie. 

One radio manufacturer product line I never owned was one from Harvey Wells. The R-9A and T-9o (receiver and transmitter) were two examples.

The R9A Receiver! The knob in the middle was a band switch and main tuning.

The T-90 Transmitter. Same deal on band switching and tuning.

These two radios were small in size as one of the market segments was as a mobile rig. The transmitter had a VFO and could also be crystal controlled. The power supply for the transmitter was external and there was even a mating Z Match Antenna Tuner. I have no data on just how popular these radios were, but they sure caught my eye. Big negative my FFS and the small tuning knob.

One other product line from Harvey Wells were the Bandmaster transmitters which command a fairly high price on eBay today. They had variants such as the Senior Model and Junior Model. The variable was power rating and features. These looked like something you might home brew in your shop. Most were Phone and CW capable, but crystal controlled. 

Harvey Wells Bandmaster Senior

The R-9A and T-90 show up from time to time on eBay and all you need to do is search BAMA for the manuals and you will quickly conclude to pass on the units. 

Still another lusted after radio was the Hammarlund HQ-180A as that just had such a cool look.


I never owned an HQ-180A but thought this was somewhere between the SP-600 JX17 and the HQ-100. I did own a SP-600 JX17, and it worked well but weighed a ton. I bought and sold quickly a HQ-100 -- just slightly better than an S-38E. Pair the HQ-180A with a Johnson Viking Valiant II and you had a serious (hernia) radio station. 


Perhaps the forerunner of the Transceiver was a jewel from Hallicrafters. This was a desk station console that included an SX-101 Receiver, HT-32B Transmitter and HT-33 Linear Amp. That thing must have weighed several hundred pounds and cost several thousand dollars. I don't have a photo of that station, but you can just imagine telling the XYL look what I bought with the charge card (forerunner of a credit card -- this was the 1950's.)

I spent a bit of time today with some radios of old as these might be what you found on the operating desks of the hams 80 years ago. Today it is either an ICOM IC7300 or a black box with no knobs.

Happy Summer.

73's
Pete N6QW
TYGNYB (Trust Your Gut Not Your Butt)

Popular posts from this blog

March 31, 2024. Happy Easter to those who celebrate this day.

What a great day to Binge on Chocolate and experience the pain of that filling that has been leaking.  I would be in that category with the leaking filling(s) had I not just spent an amount equivalent to one of the fancy new uptown appliance box transceivers on two filling repairs. Well at least I can binge on the Chocolate bunnies without fear of pain. Regrettably everything appears to have jumped in price including the price of parts. Well not so much the parts as the shipping costs.  That notably is seen in the eBay treasures. I spotted a nice heathkit DX-20 for about $50 and the shipping was $65. Likely it is a twofer with part being a way to in effect charge a higher price by inflating the shipping and in part by increased shipping costs. Shipping with insurance across the US was about $150 for this jewel and that was three years ago. 6AM on the Left Coast ~ 20M Easter Sunday! My only hope is the cost of Chocolate Bunnies remains steady although a pound of See's Candies f...

January 26, 2024. A simple CW Transceiver/Transmitter

Cruise through the lower part of the ham bands bands and what do you hear? Well, FT-8 and CW. Often you will not hear any SSB stations yet go to the lower part of the bands, and it is a cacophony (I love that word) of bad sounding signals and some high-speed keying. Fast is not so much of the issue as is bad, run together and jerky keying. But none the less our hobby started there.    So, you could crank down your ICOM 7300 and watch the waterfall on CW or you could homebrew a radio. Actually, to do CW right you need more thought up front than you do with a SSB transceiver. Often, I will state that a CW Transceiver is much more difficult to build than a simple SSB rig. I published two articles in QRP Quarterly on CW transceivers and all I got was a yawn so maybe history will repeat itself.  Yawn!   30M CW Transceiver with RIT!   Of interest is that the LO is a Varactor tuned LC oscillator using a NE602. Look closely at the RIT circuit which is only activated on ...

August 30, 2024. A PNP 20M SSB Transceiver

Shown below is the Block Diagram for the 20M PNP SSB Transceiver steered in the  Transmit Mode . The components shown in the dotted block are relay steered so that the block module is single pass and amplifies in a single direction. The Block diagram show steered in Transmit.  Essentially the steering process works so that the IF Module input follows the Balanced Modulator on Transmit and then the input side follows the Receive Mixer on Receive. All done with some relays and a bit of RG174U coax. For those who count things in detail, this block diagram is not unlike what was used for the PSSST Transceiver which can be found on my website . Yes, a warmed over P3ST only using PNP devices. TYGNYBNT. 73's Pete N6QW