Skip to main content

Obscure Radios and why some did not succeed!

In recent days I have had several email exchanges with W4OP, Dale and W9RAN, Bob. In the course of those discussions SSB radio models came up that never really made it to market. Certainly, companies like Gonset, E F Johnson and Cosmophone were not obscure and had a track record, but they really never had the success with SSB products like Heathkit, Swan, Drake, Collins and of course Atlas. 

That is a key issue as none of these companies exist today building ham equipment. So, what caused some to not enter a market or others to withdraw. An over simplistic answer is foreign competition. You know FBC, Faster, Better and Cheaper. That in my opinion is only part of the answer. 

The other part may involve the people versus a team. Swan and Atlas are synonymous with Herb Johnson. E F Johnson and Gonset, were family-owned companies as was Drake and Collins. We shouldn't forget Hallicrafters (Bill Halligan) and of course WRL (Leo Myerson) and Ten Tec (Al Khan).

One must ponder if product decisions were made based on market research or the "gut" of a single individual who started the company. There is also a bit of we are going to give it to you, and you will like it. 

I recently saw some photos of a Gonset GC-102 SSB transceiver -- it looked Klunky to me!







Look at that dial readout. You would need a 10X magnifying glass sitting in front of that small window to even guess what band and what 10kHz segment. Yes, it did have a Collins filter, but why all of the IF transformer cans. The exposed variable multiple variable capacitors shouts -- alignment issues.

The front panel has no "sex appeal" and appears rather bland. I suspect the GC-102 cost over $600 in 1967. That is about $6000 today.

Supposedly, the GC-102 would do 150 watts which is less than a Swan 500 or a Drake TR-4. Hallicrafters built some great gear that is until the FPM-300 which was competing in a market with radios from Japan. Rubber Band driven band switches are a bad idea and proved to be so. However, if you remove the main board (all SS) and S Meter from the FPM 300 and build around it, the result is a quite good radio. 



Just take a hard look at who is building radios in the US today and you can count them on one hand.  (FLEX, Elecraft and a few small boutique CW rig manufacturers) True FLEX and Elecraft sell lots of radios but there is a step function in their pricing. I simply could not afford a FLEX 8000 nor a K4. For those who would shout what about Ten Tec. Vaporware is a great word. 

So do you think tariffs will drive US companies to start building ham radios. I doubt it as we have lost a generation of innovators that once existed here and that too is needed to be successful. I would not call the GC-102 an innovation. There are no more Herb Johnson's sitting behind door #3.

Them that know can make it go.

73's 
Pete N6QW

Popular posts from this blog

January 26, 2024. A simple CW Transceiver/Transmitter

Cruise through the lower part of the ham bands bands and what do you hear? Well, FT-8 and CW. Often you will not hear any SSB stations yet go to the lower part of the bands, and it is a cacophony (I love that word) of bad sounding signals and some high-speed keying. Fast is not so much of the issue as is bad, run together and jerky keying. But none the less our hobby started there.    So, you could crank down your ICOM 7300 and watch the waterfall on CW or you could homebrew a radio. Actually, to do CW right you need more thought up front than you do with a SSB transceiver. Often, I will state that a CW Transceiver is much more difficult to build than a simple SSB rig. I published two articles in QRP Quarterly on CW transceivers and all I got was a yawn so maybe history will repeat itself.  Yawn!   30M CW Transceiver with RIT!   Of interest is that the LO is a Varactor tuned LC oscillator using a NE602. Look closely at the RIT circuit which is only activated on ...

March 31, 2024. Happy Easter to those who celebrate this day.

What a great day to Binge on Chocolate and experience the pain of that filling that has been leaking.  I would be in that category with the leaking filling(s) had I not just spent an amount equivalent to one of the fancy new uptown appliance box transceivers on two filling repairs. Well at least I can binge on the Chocolate bunnies without fear of pain. Regrettably everything appears to have jumped in price including the price of parts. Well not so much the parts as the shipping costs.  That notably is seen in the eBay treasures. I spotted a nice heathkit DX-20 for about $50 and the shipping was $65. Likely it is a twofer with part being a way to in effect charge a higher price by inflating the shipping and in part by increased shipping costs. Shipping with insurance across the US was about $150 for this jewel and that was three years ago. 6AM on the Left Coast ~ 20M Easter Sunday! My only hope is the cost of Chocolate Bunnies remains steady although a pound of See's Candies f...

August 30, 2024. A PNP 20M SSB Transceiver

Shown below is the Block Diagram for the 20M PNP SSB Transceiver steered in the  Transmit Mode . The components shown in the dotted block are relay steered so that the block module is single pass and amplifies in a single direction. The Block diagram show steered in Transmit.  Essentially the steering process works so that the IF Module input follows the Balanced Modulator on Transmit and then the input side follows the Receive Mixer on Receive. All done with some relays and a bit of RG174U coax. For those who count things in detail, this block diagram is not unlike what was used for the PSSST Transceiver which can be found on my website . Yes, a warmed over P3ST only using PNP devices. TYGNYBNT. 73's Pete N6QW