New Technology for 2020 ~ A Direct Conversion Receiver You Can Build

Some Arduino Code as used with the Left Coast Loafer CW Transmitter.

//Turn ON:     si5351.clock_enable(SI5351_CLK1, 1);
//Turn OFF:   si5351.clock_enable(SI5351_CLK1, 0);

/*OK you missed it -- the "1" turns it on and the "0" turns it off.)

So my code senses if Pin 4 is LOW and if so then turn ON the CLK1. If it is not LOW then turn it OFF. This is the standard If Else regime. You also have to blank out the frequency in the else part of the code. Here is the code*/

 void CheckCW() {

                 digitalRead(4);
                 if(digitalRead(4) == LOW){
                 si5351.clock_enable(SI5351_CLK1, 1);
       
                 si5351.set_freq( rx1 - 700, 0, SI5351_CLK1);
                 
   
                 
         }
            else{
              
si5351.clock_enable(SI5351_CLK1, 0);
}
}


I plan on a MOX operation where you flip a switch and that turns on CLK1 and at the same time does the TR. There is embedded code to produce a pulsed 1kHz Tone for tune up. 

No reason with a little code rework that this 988Hz Tone would be the side tone. Since you have side tone the same code that turns on CLK1 could also turn OFF CLK0 which is the Rx LO. Lots of possibilities.


73's
Pete N6QW


Pre-Built Audio CW Filters for the DCR.



Thanks to a friend in the Mid-west the following are some links for audio active CW filters that could be used with the DCR


* 4 States QRP has the Hi-Per-Mite 200 Hz Bandwidth, 700 Hz Passband Kit.





* New England QRP NESCAF Filter Kit variable Bandwidth  90  - 1500 Hz, 700 Hz Center Frequency.





* SOTABEAMS Dual Bandwidth Filters (there are several models to choose from) CW 300-1300 Hz, 550 Hz-850 Bandwith





* Vectronics VEC-820K 80, 110,180 Hz Bandwidths 750 Hz Center Frequency



More helpful Amidon information. How many turns of what size wire will fit on a core?

Pete N6QW

Cracking the CW Nut...

After some lengthy discussions with N2CQR, I guess we've concluded the most applicable CW solution is to have one of the clocks generate (F-700hz) where F is the LO Frequency and tune to the upper signal so that on transmit you are Zero Beat with the opposite station. I like the 74AC08 idea from K1SWL so that a gating signal is supplied to one of the sections and the (F-700) is transmitted to the rest of the circuit. Although I would skip the three BS170's in favor of a 2N2219A driving the IRF510. Further study needed to finalize the circuitry; but we may have something in a week or so.

73's
Pete N6QW

Trust But Verify...

A long time ago (read maybe 15 years ago) Amidon who makes/sell Ferrite and Iron Powder cores so often used in our projects, offered (for free) a handy guide that documented the parameters of the cores. There was even data on how many turns of various wire sizes would fit on a specific core. While I said it was a handy guide, it was actually like a folded Road Map that when opened fully is like about 2 feet square with printing on both sides. Mine gets frequent use.

I had always used an Al Value for the FT-37-43 core of 420 because that is what printed in the guide. Below is a sample of two of the pages from the guide. If you squint, then you can see the Al Value for the FT-37-43 is 420.


Fast forward to a couple of years ago and I was ordering some cores from Amidon and when I called up the catalog page I spotted that the Al Value was now 380 not 420. So I just filed that away in my brain and used that number when I calculated cores.

Just yesterday I had an email exchange with KK4DAS about some LT Spice simulations involving inductors and he and I had different values of inductance. I emailed Dean, and noted that the Al Value I used was 380 not the 420. He then emailed back and said the Amidon Website now shows 350 as the Al Value. 

So likely the formulation of the Ferrite Core material has changed and so the published 420 in the handy guide is now 350. Likely others have changed. So a word of caution to myself, check the Amidon specifications as likely others have changed too! Trust but Verify!

A superb source for any and all cores is W8DIZ as his pricing and shipping costs are far less than the original supplier. To wit a small batch of core (FT-37-43) from the supplier was about $10 but the shipping/handling was $14. I got the same batch of cores from W8DIZ for less cost and about 1/2 the shipping. Again: Trust and Verify.

Back to looking at companion CW transmitter for the DCR... There are some technical issues to using the DCR and tracking the proper offset. I am sure there is a simple solution but just not readily evident. 

The simplest solution to get on the air quickly is to build a crystal controlled transmitter. I happen to have rocks for 7030, 7040 and 7058 kHz. So that gives a bit of frequency agility. Another solution is a second Arduino/Si5351 which adds a bit of cost; but you can transmit anywhere. 

I was made aware of a project from Dave Benson K1SWL called the Hill Topper which use a 74AC08 driving a pair of BS170's. It appears like the 74AC08 is "gated on" and driven by CLK1 to produce the CW waveform. 

73's
Pete, N6QW


Thoughts on using the DCR as a CW Transceiver. 

I have heard and guess have seen as well the DSB transceiver trick although using DSB on 40M could well risk one's life. You know the SDR Police with their 72 inch screens would tell you that you are transmitting on two sidebands. Well Duh, that would be true; but there is no carrier present so you couldn't call it "faux" AM.

CW seems like a better course as most of the SDR Police wouldn't know how to do the binary form of communication. 

There is a bit of leverage here with the Arduino and the availability of three clocks. Several years ago I built the Left Coast Loafer which was a filter type CW transceiver. There was a trick to enabling a clock (with a hold time) thus you could program that clock to be off frequency by 700 Hertz and thus account for the offset and that clock would only be ON when you engaged the transmitter.

W7ZOI used a NE555 trick that when you hit the Key the NE555 would stay on for short periods of time providing power to downstream circuits even though the key was in the up state. There was a timing cap that held the NE555 on for enough time to form characters. The Arduino could simulate the NE555 and so that piece is taken care. The offset is just simple programming. 

Now the second trick would be to have the Si5351 CW clock in an ON state during the timing cycle and the trick from the old days when there were drifty VFO's was to have the VFO run continuously -- not keyed and a subsequent Buffer stage was keyed. This also enabled  one to shape the keying of the buffer so that it sounded crisp. 

I would not include an RIT but there circuits to do so. If the DCR would be a piece of a CW transceiver then audio filtering would be a welcomed addition. There are kits for sale or you could build one out of a couple of op-amps. Given my very negative view of op amp filters, I would probably not use one. That would be fine for me as I am not a CW person and my interest would be just to "kluge" something together to have a proof of concept.

Now as to power level. I would look to getting one of those $12 Linear amp boards from China that are good for 20 to 30 watts and then you could reliably make contacts. Keep in mind Heathkit sold DX-20's, DX-35's and DX-40's long before any HW-7's or HW-8's hit the market. the objective is to make contacts not cause angst! 

So I have been thinking about the "how to". But some may have already have such a transceiver in their shack. I am impressed by the sensitivity and the crisp signals being copied -- so I may just have to noodle a bit more on this

Be safe.

73's
Pete N^QW

 

t "Listen to the Music" (Sound) of this Rig!

Pete N6QW

Northern California is On Fire... 

Terrible Fires and More on the way. But in the face of adversity there are always those who see the glass as half full. Take our dear friend Napoleon Dynamite. A friend sent this to me and I am not sure of the genesis of the poster; but aptly in the middle of a world wide pandemic, major fires burning millions of acres,  an inept emperor, and 178,000 deaths -- we need a bit of a lift. 


Notice he is wearing his Pocket Protector & ID Badge. That means he is employed--Nerds Rule!

WSPR & FT-8 Copied on the Cat-Around!

Now that we have your attention...

How about building a simple Direct Conversion Receiver? The parts cost is within the realm of reason and the most critical device costs $0.82 at Mouser in single lots. The use of single sided copper vector board facilitates construction and provides a superior ground plane to make all common connections. 



The MC1496 DCR on 20M --- Try this with your Drifty Analog VFO. Since it is a DCR the LO has to be on 20M. 



Part II of the 2nd 40M Listening Test below. I added a 100NF across the Volume control and that improved some of the background "hiss". This keeps getting better!



I made an adjustment so that the LCD will read the correct actual frequency. In a DCR the dial reads off by the audio value








The MC1496 can be bought at Mouser for $0.82 an SMD Version so you will need an adapter board. A DIP version is sold by Jameco Electronics for $1.95 and they have 200 pieces in stock.

Let us start with a Block Diagram. I call it the Cat-Around and later on, that will become clear as to why it is called by that name..


We will test out the idea of a 2N3906 as a broad band RF amplifier stage. (This was described on the blog about a week ago). 



I happen to have a two section 40M Band Pass Filter that I will use for initial testing although later it likely will be shifted to a 3 section. I would think that the three most desirable bands would be 40, 30 and 20 Meters. I do have data on 3 section filters which I will subsequently post.

The MC1496 Detector is straight out of the Motorola Data Sheets 


Luckily the MC1496 is an active device so has some gain. But typically 100 dB of total system gain separates the toys from the boys. Thus we need some pretty healthy gain following the detection so the MC1496 will be followed by a really robust audio amp stage comprised of a 2N3904 driving the 8 pin LM-380-N audio IC. On a clear day with the planets aligned, the 8 Pin DIP version of the LM-380 could do about 1 watt. 

No Analog LO's (VFO) will be used for this project and that too will later become apparent (no drift or wobbly frequency stuff in my projects). One test objective will be to see how well this DCR copies WSPR and FT-8.

Thus our LO is supplied by the Si-5351 and an Arduino Uno R3. Yes the Uno is clunky and the new Seeduino Xiao would be cool; but I happen to have a few of these early space hog relics in the bin thus IUWIH. The readout is the 16X2 Cool Blue LCD.

If you had to purchase all new parts you would likely escape for around $40. Think of it as about 11 gallons of gas that you saved from not driving so much. Besides no bad emissions to pollute the air.

The beauty of the single sided copper vector board used for the project is that it is like regular perforated board but has a copper surface. This copper surface forms an excellent common ground plane with the bonus that in the event you need to add shielding around a circuit some scrap copper PC board can be simply soldered in place to form the shield. 

But there is some tribal knowledge to using this material such as preventing shorts to ground. To make for clean penetration holes, I use a 1/8 inch drill bit to remove material from around the hole for all connections that pass through the board as all wired connections are made on the underside (insulated side) of the board.



This is the board underside and the only cross over connections are the power wiring shown in Orange. The Connections form the Si5351 and the RF amp were just tacked to the anchor pins so they do not look very sanitary. These will be changed to more permanent and more cosmetic states. I was sort of in a hurry to get this thing fired up and the garage was >100F

For those connections that are grounded you simply solder the part right to the top ground pane. The SIP stock has machined pins. So for the socket installation, I first use the 1/8 inch bit to remove the copper from around the holes and then I drill through the holes with a 1/16 inch bit. The machined pin stock material simply drops into the hole and no pins are shorted to ground. For good measure I super glue the socket material to the top of the ground plane. Below shows the initial parts layout, the drilling and reaming of penetration holes and the final install of parts.





The board size is 4.5 inches long by about 1.75 inches wide.

On the right is the MC1496 followed by the 2N3904, about center and on the left is the LM380-N. The devices are socketed so if you smoke something -- easy parts replacement. all of the sockets were made from the SIP material. 






Above is the very healthy LM-380-N Audio Amp schematic.


A 40 pin breakable SIP strip cost about $1. A single strip (14 + 8 +3) yields enough pins plus some extras for the devices. I also use the pins as anchor points for like the audio pot, the audio output, at the LO in and Signal input and power. If you have been counting -- that is 40 pins with a few spares!

I have tested the audio amp and it is plenty robust but have not as yet tested the detector. With temperatures in may garage exceeding 100F -- you literally do not need a soldering iron to solder.

The Arduino is programmed and working and I do have a BPF. Tomorrow I hope to build the 2N3906 amp stage and so we will be able to test the whole system. Figure about 10 hours to build.

There is one critical piece here that I should mention. I do all of the parts arrangement using a standard piece of PC Board and then just move everything around until crossovers are minimized and we have a compact layout. I leave that intact while I build the final unit so that I have a reference where the parts go. It also tells me which are through holes versus ones soldered to the top ground plane.

But even then I often make some circuit twizzles while building the final board. But at least as I do the final build, I  know where to lay out the parts, which are grounded and which are through hole. That my friend is Tribal Knowledge!



Stay tuned for the excitement ahead. 






73's
Pete N6QW

PSA: If you want to Dump Trump --Vote before November 3. He is doing everything he can to invalidate your vote. 

New Technology for 2020 ~ Tripping Back in Time to Earlier Advanced Technology

Reflecting Back In Time...

[N2CQR, Bill, reminded me that Direct Conversion Receivers were embedded in commercial product offerings such  as the famous Heathkit HW-7 and HW-8. I also think one or two Ten Tec Rigs may also have employed that same DCR technology. I seem to recall The Century 21 as being one. But i might have that wrong. Elementary bare bones rigs like the PIXIE are in reality crystal controlled DCR's. 

KK7B published an article on a phasing receiver that at the heart uses two DCR's and shows a technique for eliminating one of the sidebands.

There are of course many published articles from sources like the GQRP SPRAT and QQ that have documented such DCR projects. Below from Winter 2012 QQ is a FB article from the prolific and world renown author N6QW. Too bad it used an Analog LO which is a real detractor to this project.]




The prior photos that were posted in this run highlight and focus on the "artful" nature of those homebrew rigs. Skill was needed to blend the electronic hardware with common materials like wood. Regrettably you develop no construction and fabrication skills from the mere flashing the plastic at Amamzon.com

The wooden bases stand out and were likely painted and shined before final assembly of the electronic parts. The evidence is clear they simply looked "cool". I have tried to carry on that tradition with my painting of rigs with vibrant colors such as Juliano Blue or Julieyellow. 

But what about receivers? The form of our receivers has taken an interesting journey form Coherent Detectors to the DDC. But one particular form popularized by W7ZOI is the Direct Conversion Receiver (DCR) whose roots reach back to the 1960's, which may in fact be older than some of the blog readers. Notwithstanding that the DCR was subject to hum pickup and you did get the same station at two places on the dial. It was indeed a staple of the QRP community. The received signals had "presence" as identified by another giant W1FB, Doug DeMaw. 

As for me personally I have not built too many DCR's with the only ones being built were the one that was an integral part of the Lets Build Something Transceiver project where the DCR was morphed into a full fledged SSB transceiver. I also wrote an another article for QRP Quarterly that used a DGM as a DCR. BUT more recently I have built literally a dozen DCR's that are an integral part of the five SDR transceivers sitting in the N6QW Laboratories. 

A pair of DCR detectors (two ADE-1's) form the mainboard of my homebrew SDR rigs. True I did address the hum issue with some modem coupling transformers and the software takes care of single signal reception. But the Bonus is that they transceive! 

I like to take a moment to talk just a bit about how the DCR works. In simplistic terms I like to think of the DCR as a three terminal device. One terminal has the signal input off of the air. A second terminal has a local oscillator input and the third terminal is the Output port. Essentially the DCR converts the signal off the air into audio. The process is a lot more complicated than this; but for our discussion think In, In and Out. Because of the direct conversion process we find that we get the recovered audio at two places on the dial. 


Say we have a 1khz tone transmitted on 7.2 MHz we can get a 1 kHz audio tone output at two LO Settings. Actually some of the resultant mixing frequencies are at 14 MHz; but are not passed on to the audio amp stage.

Most of the simple DCR's rely on the computer between our ears to sort out the right signals. Yet there are other ways to remove the unwanted signal; but often very complex signal processing involving a computer or the internal computer we all have in our heads to make that happen.

But why screw with DCR's and the answer is simple --yes Simple Circuitry. A four pin TUF-1 DBM has the necessary three ports plus ground on a device that fits on your thumbnail. 

Because there is a conversion loss in a DBM like the TUF-1 you probably need some sort of a simple RF amp stage ahead of this (like maybe a use for our PNP transistor amp) and a Band Pass Filter since essentially any and all frequencies are being received. A strong audio amp to follow the DCR is a must. Forget configuring a 741 op-amp like an audio amp -- think like a 2N3904 driving an LM380. You can search this blog for LM-380 audio amp.

For those who would profess an interest in homebrewing something, a direct conversion receiver is a really excellent first step. W7ZOI built a project called The Weekender Special which was two separate units a DCR using a DBM and then a companion transmitter. Check that out.

Now I know there are other forms of the DCR including the use of a Dual Gate MOSFET such as the 40673 which can be simulated with two J310's. Earlier I mentioned my article in QQ about such a project.

Still other more sophisticated IC devices like the those from Motorola and Plessey that are used a Product Detectors are great candidates.

Gulp, you could even home brew a double balanced mixer with four diodes and two ferrite cores and that would work. There are three you tube videos from N6QW that show you how. 

BUT for those new to homebrewing --Don't. It is hard to replicate a DBM built on a manufacturing line versus one you cobbled together in your hot garage shack. First there is the problem of truly matched diodes and secondly the winding of the toroids is critical. Do Not Believe all of the claims of amazing results with a homebrew DBM. I found that even this unit was lossy and versus being a 7 dBm device was more like 10 dBm which requires a higher LO drive level. It was deaf until we upped the juice. Later when you have a working DCR with a real DBM you can think homebrew.


This an example of a homebrew DBM that was used in the LBS Project and served both as a Product Detector and Balanced Modulator. This has some refinements like AF filtering on the output and a balance pot control. With a bit of additional components you can remotely unbalance the DBM such as you might want for CW generation. Yes Virginia you can find that in EMRFD from W6JFR (me).

Today's post is to get you thinking about doing something other than ordering parts from Amazon.com and using tools other than your plastic card.

73's
Pete N6QW



Very Early Rigs looked maybe like this.




 
It is said that Denny's will give you a free meal if it is your Birthday. But if it is your Birthday and you are in Denny's for that free meal then possibly your Life Sucks! [This was on a Bumper Sticker and it caught my eye!]












At times when we look at the photos above we think of simple times and yet fun times. The cost was not large; but the results were stunning. Yes I did build one or two of these elegant rigs back in the day. Some of us actually yearn for a return to those days when all hams acted in a courteous manner.

Just listen to the foul language on 75 and 40M or as I heard today from some hams in Arizona staking a claim that Senator Harris in not a citizen and therefore could not run for VP. It was Gospel as they heard it from the emperor himself. Wow, there really are ignorant people out there and many are hams.

Simpler times and simple technology are a lost dream.  No Menus and no fancy $300 microphones. Just simple rigs that made contacts. CONAR Receivers and Transmitters were kits offered by NRI that really was a mail order technical school that sold the kits as a part of the course offerings. 




The pair were triband and pretty rudimentary. For a mere $400 you can now buy  both of them on eBay. For a lot less money you could actually build them. Oh forgot,  a significant segment of our ham brethren  do not build things -- I guess that is why the price is out of line.

Take a moment to think if you were to build a rig what would it be?

I just heard Texas has over 10K deaths from Covid19. Our hearts and prayers go out to all of those grieving families. But two people are responsible for this: Donald J. Trump and Greg Abbott! [Let us also not forget Mike Pence.] 

Their lack of leadership is  the core issue. Implementation of a national mask policy would have avoided many of these needless passing's. November 3rd is your chance to change the landscape!

73's
Pete N6QW


New Technology for 2020 ~ What should you believe?

Baffled by What I See!

August 16, 2020

I started this by asking what should you believe and one blog reader suggested I look at a couple of plots that measured the V out divided by the V in. This measure tells much about your circuit but has left me with some yet more questions about what to believe. My earlier plots looked only at output form the circuit not a measure of how the circuit responds (V out) in comparison to the input (V in).

So I did that (interesting results):

Wow the ratio of the output to the input is FLAT and the V in appears to be affected by circuit loading versus frequency. So this is not termination insensitive although the relative measure of the ratio is consistently flat. Now I ask the question that what really counts is what is coming out of the stage to drive the next stage looking only at the output. We next look at charts where we measure the Ratio, V out and V input.

There is close to  a 3db Drop in output at 10 Meters with the 100nF. Now we repeat with the 4.7nF

The output drops by about 1.75 dB at 10 Meters so a bit better. But the price is paid on the front end.


The Long Story Short: For IF Applications leave C1 = 100nF. If using this amp as a general amp stage as in a broad band  RF amp consider changing the 100nF to 4.7nF.

********
Long standing there has always been a belief that if anything is ever published in EMRFD then it has to be Gospel and all things for some techie types must have their roots traced to some chapter or Figure in EMRFD. There is even a cult of illuminati who spend endless hours on blogs and websites scouring circuits and then commenting "well in EMRFD this is how it is done". Actually EMRFD serves me well as a bookend.

There are about two or three circuits in that publication that have caught my eye and up front I have used them. One in particular has been the Plessey circuit of Fig 6.110 which is a simple two transistor amplifier (2N3904 and 2N3906) that is bilateral. I have used it in many transceivers as the signal reversal merely involves changing one connection from ground to a positive source -- easily done with a localized relay. Below is the schematic of two such stages wrapped around a 9 MHz Filter and used in The Simple SSB Transceiver which can be found at www.n6qw.com


The first use of this arrangement was in my 20M shirt pocket SSB Transceiver.


As you can see this got shrunk down to a very small size.[Sitting behind that amplifier board is a homebrew 4.9152 MHz Crystal Filter.]  

But not leaving well enough alone I then created a SMD layout for this circuit so I could use the CNC Mill. I have labeled the components so you can readily identify what is what. This is for the EMRFD illuminati who can't read schematics!


So how does this circuit really work? Well for starters the 2N3904 is used to send signals from LEFT to RIGHT where typically if ahead of the filter would be to send the output to the Crystal filter and most often as in Receive.  

The output of the second stage following the filter is to the Product Detector. Now "throwing the switch" the signal path reverses and the circuit works RIGHT to LEFT such as you would have in the Transmit sequence. The PD is now a Balanced Modulator and the signal goes through the IF Module in the opposite direction.

Close examination of the 2N3904 has the 100 Ohm Emitter resistor grounded in Receive and so it is operating and sends the signal from LEFT to RIGHT. Simultaneously the 100 Ohm Emitter resistor on the 2N3906 is Grounded SO IT IS NOT AMPLIFYING! Now we engage the Relay and the 2N3904 Emitter  is being fed +8 VDC so it is NOT amplifying but now the Emitter of the 2N3906 (PNP) is supplied +8 VDC is now the active element. Pretty cool beans!

Since this circuit came from EMRFD and obviously blessed by the illuminati, I never had cause to look at a simulation of the circuit. Of particular interest was the PNP portion. I must confess when I think about amplifier stages never do I think PNP. So now was the time!

My results leave me with a huge knot in my stomach. Here is the PNP circuit redrawn in LT Spice.

So to those pseudo illuminati who read this blog please check that I have accurately reproduced just the PNP circuit. The load is 50 Ohms as shown as R6.

Now the "AGHAST PART" -- the Plot of this PNP Amp above.


This circuit would work well on the lower frequencies but sucks beyond 30M. So a huge RED FLAG --while it amplifies it drops by 3 dB over the HF band. 

So now lets "diddle a bit" with circuit values. As to the why I looked at this one area in particular I can only suggest --been here before and this change usually affects frequency repsonse. C1 was Changed from 100nF to 4.7nF.

This small circuit change appears to have flattened the response out to 30MHz with a bit of a lower gain on 80M. I think less gain on 80M is a far better trade off to having a flatter gain across the rest of the HF band. Same circuit with only one capacitor change appears to make a marked improvement in overall frequency response.

So what is wrong here? This circuit is in EMRFD, it is in the bible and is read as the Holy Gospel by the radio illuminati. Is there something wrong here? 

Wow surprise, no emails on this but there is information in the data which may shed some light on why no one has jumped on this before. 

C'mon EMRFD illuminati you may have missed this. But the Plessey circuit is being used as an IF amplifier stage where typically the IF Frequencies are  less than 13 MHz. (Look at the Bitx series at 12 MHz). So as long as there is reasonable gain up to 12 MHz or so, then having the gain drop off beyond that may be of no consequence. 

But just suppose this stage was used elsewhere such as a bi-directional Receiver RF Amplifier and Transmit Pre-Driver say on 20 Meters and above, then the capacitor change is critical. Look at the plots above.

The circuit was developed by Plessey for use in military equipment. History tells us a lot of military gear operated in the 2 to 12 MHz range (often with a 16MHz IF)  so that is a possible explanation. Another is that circuit simulation techniques may have been limited at the time this was developed. Still a possibility I did something wrong. 

But more importantly I did something right! For this circuit as I have drawn it -- one capacitor change dramatically improves the over all wide band frequency response The bonus: this modified circuit likely would make a good Receiver RF Amp stage in a homebrew receiver -- note no tuned circuits! The Double Bonus --- I have a large jar of PNP transistors that I often said too bad these are not NPN. Well maybe I now have some very new opportunities and challenges to use the PNP devices. Just thinking -- an all PNP SSB transceiver. 

For the keen observer(s) -- the Fig 6.110 uses 6 VDC with an explanation as to why. I have moved that voltage up to 8 VDC with no issues. 

Again Baffled by what I see in the plot. The EMRFD authors say the circuit is good for about 17 dB through 40MHz. Given the losses in the filter such a module could have an overall gain in the 25 dB range. 17dB X2 = 34 dB and assuming a 10 dB Filter Insertion loss results in the around 25 dB gain number.

Now there are some things that could impact the results; but I am dubious of such an outcome. The PNP circuit was taken in isolation as if the NPN part were absent. True, based on how Ground or Voltage is applied only one portion is ON at any one time. But there are other components connected to the circuit. Inactive components I would think would actually degrade performance and not enhance it.

So this exercise with the Plessey Circuit is an extension of what  good ham friend from Austin, Texas inscribes on all of the shematics he generates. TRUST BUT VERIFY! 

I have TRUSTED the Plessey Circuit for many years and the results have been excellent mostly becuase I have used it with IF Frequencies in the range of 3 to 10 MHz, where obvioulsy it works. Recently I had an interest in using this amplifier for applications other than an IF stage which caused me to VERIFY its wideband performance. Now I can see where use in others applications such as a wide band bilateral RF ampilfier would require some tweaking such as the capacitor change.

73's
Pete N6QW

Neutralization.

The word neutralization has many interesting meanings. For Mafia Dons, like the Tony Soprano types, the word has the definition of simply el...